Understanding Resistance to Change

In my initial years at a prominent university, I transferred to a department regarded as both prestigious and influential. To my astonishment, I found myself working on a modest 15-inch laptop, rather than the dual monitors and larger screens I had previously used. This transition felt akin to stepping back in time.

However, I quickly arranged for the entire team to receive a second monitor. Surprisingly, my coworkers exhibited little gratitude for this upgrade. Two of the five team members even left their new monitors in their boxes, despite the IT department being ready to assist with setup.

This resistance can be analyzed through the lens of Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) theory, which reveals our tendency to favor group hierarchies and dominance. Essentially, those in positions of power often resist relinquishing their control, which not only preserves the status quo but reinforces it. New employees with innovative ideas often find themselves stifled by long-standing members who cling tightly to their decision-making authority.

Navigating Cultural Dynamics

The entrenched resistance I observed illustrates a broader cultural issue within organizations, where established attitudes and behaviors hinder progress. The pushback against change is not merely about the transition itself, but about the threat it poses to existing power structures.

Even a small adjustment, like adding a dual monitor, can feel monumental in such environments. This rigidity can manifest as apathy, decreased motivation, avoidance, or increased stress and anxiety about any change, revealing a form of learned helplessness within the organization.

Higher education is particularly known for its sluggish pace of change. The term "innovation" can evoke fear, akin to a dreaded specter. I once had a supervisor who commented that provosts come and go, bringing grand agendas that, if endured long enough, would fade away, allowing things to return to their comfortable status quo.

When change does occur, it often arrives in a top-down manner, leaving employees reeling from the abrupt shift. The ideal outcome is that the initiative collapses before full implementation; the worst is a disastrous fallout that must be managed once the administrator departs.

The common response is to "duck and cover," hoping that any damage will be manageable.

The Trauma of Disruption

Experiencing organizational change can resemble dealing with PTSD, where reform is perceived as a loss of control, rather than an exciting opportunity. Unfortunately, these fears often become self-fulfilling prophecies.

Every request, no matter how minor, is interpreted as a threat. The individuals feeling most vulnerable, clinging to their influence, tend to resist the hardest. My monitors remained boxed up for weeks until a new electronic sign-in system necessitated their use. Ironically, once everyone acclimated, they praised the monitors, realizing how beneficial they were when we had to work off-site.

If you believe that securing everyone's buy-in will facilitate future initiatives, prepare for the fact that it will still require patience and effort to guide a fearful team toward progress.

Leading by Example

The most effective approach is to model openness to new methods, encouraging team members to share innovative ideas and rewarding those who take the initiative to devise creative solutions. It's about supporting your staff, with results often emerging over time.

What are some practical steps to facilitate this process?

1. Incremental Change: Adopt a gradual approach, using small, manageable interventions to shift attitudes and behaviors. This method resembles a desensitization process, allowing individuals to adjust without feeling overwhelmed.
2. Building Momentum: Demonstrating the benefits of incremental changes can help maintain engagement without causing chaos. For example, after introducing dual monitors, we transitioned to a digital sign-in system, followed by satisfaction surveys and digital files over the course of a year.
3. Psychological Safety: Ensuring a supportive environment is critical for fostering adaptation. Rapid changes can lead to confusion and resistance, causing employees to feel unsupported and increasing turnover.

The Long-Term Benefits of Patience

While it's essential to be empathetic toward those struggling to adapt, inappropriate or hostile behavior must be addressed promptly. Positive reinforcement can help even the most reluctant employees gradually embrace change.

However, if resistance persists, a different conversation is necessary. Using nudge theory can help people feel more in control of their choices, making transitions smoother and more palatable.

In my experience, my colleagues' initial reluctance to use the monitors did not hinder the group. Observing the positive outcomes led them to eventually embrace the change. They even expressed gratitude once they felt comfortable integrating into the team.

Celebrating Small Victories

Cultivating team support begins with fostering a positive atmosphere, recognizing small wins, and suppressing any negative reactions. Although the journey may start steep, it becomes more manageable over time.

By steering clear of mandates and adopting a compassionate approach, you can transform opposition into a driving force for progress. Your team will appreciate your efforts in the long run.

1. Encourage a Growth Mindset: Foster a culture that values creativity, adaptability, and open-mindedness. Just as a garden flourishes with care, individuals can continuously develop new skills.
2. Recognize Achievements: Implement a recognition system to celebrate each step forward. Acknowledging incremental progress enhances motivation and illustrates that every achievement contributes to organizational success.
3. Embrace Flexibility: Create practices that enable your team to navigate evolving challenges. Allow them to learn from failures without fear, ensuring that your organization can adapt smoothly to transformations.

Who would have thought that a seemingly simple 20-inch monitor could become a catalyst for such psychological turmoil and organizational change? Sometimes, what appears to be a minor adjustment can provoke significant stress for others.

Ultimately, approaching these situations with compassion and understanding can lead to positive outcomes, and your staff may eventually express their gratitude for the changes.

Find our submission guidelines to become a writer for PoW and the latest stories HERE

© 2024 Bette A. Ludwig: All rights reserved.