The Purpose Behind Moon Missions

One common argument among moon landing skeptics is: if we've previously visited the Moon, why haven't we returned using the same designs? During the 1960s, the space race was fiercely competitive; the USSR had launched the first satellite and the first human into space. In response, the United States made it a priority to land a man on the Moon, primarily for political reasons—to outpace the USSR.

Once the U.S. achieved this monumental goal, enthusiasm for Moon missions dwindled significantly among both lawmakers and the public. Consequently, NASA experienced severe funding cuts, which made future Apollo missions unfeasible, as each mission cost over a billion dollars. Although an initial 20 missions were planned, the last three were scrapped because technological advancements weren’t considered urgent.

For several years, there was little competition in space exploration. While Russia no longer posed a significant challenge to the U.S., China is beginning to emerge as a potential competitor. The absence of competition raises the question: without a rival, what incentive is there to return to the Moon? However, recent reductions in flight costs and a renewed interest in lunar exploration have reignited discussions about returning to our satellite.

Funding Challenges

Moreover, NASA's current budget does not allow for a robust lunar exploration program. In 2018, the agency received $20 billion. While this may seem substantial, it's worth noting that developing and launching the Saturn V rocket alone would have cost $50 billion in 2014 dollars. During the height of the space race, NASA's budget was a hefty half a percent of the U.S. GDP, whereas today it stands at a mere 0.001%.

Skeptics often question why NASA can't simply replicate past missions since the rocket and lunar module designs are available. The straightforward answer is that the Apollo program is rooted in 1960s technology, which is now outdated. Modern advancements allow for the development of safer, more efficient, and cost-effective spacecraft than those used in the past.

Source: http://www.time.kg

To recreate the outdated rockets and spacecraft, we would need to reinstate the manufacturing processes that are no longer in place, as many of the facilities have been repurposed or shut down. Furthermore, utilizing antiquated computers, which are no longer operational, would pose a significant obstacle. Who would even be able to program them today?

Future Lunar Missions

In the 1960s, the motivation for lunar missions was largely political rather than scientific. Now, however, we view the Moon as a vital site for scientific and engineering testing, where we could establish bases for ongoing expeditions. This approach will prepare us for more ambitious missions, such as those aimed at Mars.

NASA is now gearing up for the Artemis III mission, which aims to land astronauts on the Moon and conduct new scientific research on its surface. Following this mission, NASA envisions a sustained lunar presence, which includes establishing a base camp for long-term expeditions on our celestial neighbor.

If you want to see more articles about space in your feed, clap! Don't forget to subscribe to our channel and share your questions, which I’ll address in future articles.

Explore the complexities of lunar missions with insights on why returning to the Moon is a significant challenge.

Discover the reasons behind the absence of human return trips to the Moon since the last Apollo mission.