Why My Company Abandoned Performance-Based Pay Raises
Written on
Chapter 1: The Flaws in Performance-Based Evaluations
During high school, I had a computer instructor who seemed indifferent to my efforts. While other teachers acknowledged my work, he rated my final project—a HyperCard presentation on cats—with a mere 3 out of 5, resulting in a "B" grade. This grade clashed with an otherwise stellar academic record, and I often reflected on how arbitrary it felt. We were allowed to choose any topic for our final project, and I perceived no significant difference between my work and that of my peers. The lack of feedback left me frustrated, and I suspected my teacher had biases—perhaps against cats or female students—though I had no proof.
Such experiences are common; many of us have encountered educators who display favoritism or biases. This human element can overshadow even the most structured grading systems, leading to issues of gender and racial bias.
As I transitioned to the professional realm, I faced an even murkier evaluation system. My bartending days were evaluated through tips, while my early entrepreneurial efforts lacked any formal assessments. It wasn't until I secured a "real" job at 29 that I received my first performance review.
I felt disheartened by my results. Scoring all fours—essentially equivalent to a series of Bs—came with a bonus and raise I found generous, yet I had no understanding of how these figures were determined or how I compared to my colleagues. I was handed a slip of paper with numbers scribbled hastily, an act that felt overly dramatic. It was only later that I learned managers were discouraged from giving perfect scores, as it might be "demotivating." This approach to motivation was baffling compared to my high school experience, where high grades had always encouraged me.
Each passing year saw my scores shift from fours to increasingly frequent threes, which directly impacted my financial stability. My ability to support my family was tied to an evaluation process that was opaque and inadequately explained. When I sought clarification, my manager's answers were vague at best, leaving me feeling more confused than before.
This video discusses the implications of performance-based evaluations and how they can create a toxic work environment.
Section 1.1: The Impact of Favoritism
In my experience, several factors influenced my performance rating beyond actual productivity. The first was whether I was in good standing with senior management. The CEO's notorious temper meant that one misstep could lead to being sidelined. While I managed to maintain a positive relationship, a colleague I supervised faced unfair treatment. Despite his commendable work ethic, my boss insisted on downgrading his scores to avoid upsetting the CEO.
Workplace politics often create environments where favoritism reigns, allowing biases to permeate evaluations. Even when executives behave decently, their unconscious biases can affect those below them.
Section 1.2: The Necessity of Self-Promotion
I soon realized that excelling at my job wasn't enough; I also needed to promote my achievements. I taught myself Google Analytics, crafting reports filled with attractive graphs and growth metrics to impress the senior team. While my work genuinely contributed to our success, the focus was more on presentation than actual performance.
Self-promotion is a valuable skill, yet it shouldn't overshadow true contributions. Many individuals generate significant impact without the means or time to showcase their efforts effectively.
Chapter 2: The Problems with Metrics
This video explores the differences between pay raises and cost of living adjustments, shedding light on how performance metrics can be misleading.
Section 2.1: The Pitfalls of Metrics
While metrics can be useful, many organizations rely on arbitrary measures. Often, these metrics are created to appease higher-ups, lacking any real-world grounding. In my previous job, the CEO's unrealistic expectations for usage metrics further illustrated this disconnect.
Even when metrics are grounded in reality, creating uniform benchmarks across departments is nearly impossible. Different teams are measured against differing standards, often based on guesswork rather than objective criteria.
Section 2.2: The "Butt in Seat" Mentality
Another flawed metric revolves around physical presence. Even in remote work situations, the notion that time spent at a desk equates to commitment persists. Many fail to recognize that productivity and meaningful contributions aren't tied to the hours spent in front of a screen.
The focus on visible commitment often leads to undervaluing employees who prioritize efficiency over mere presence. Studies indicate that constant connectivity doesn't necessarily enhance performance.
Section 2.3: The Inequity of Individual Credit
Work culture often espouses teamwork, yet performance-based evaluations can undermine collaboration. They foster competition rather than unity, promoting individuals who excel at self-promotion and credit-taking. Those who prefer to share acknowledgment may find themselves sidelined.
Instead of fostering a supportive environment, performance-based raises can cultivate resentment among colleagues.
In conclusion, I advocate for a reevaluation of how we assess performance. At my company, we engage in "Quarterly Conversations" with managers that allow for open discussions on accomplishments and areas for improvement without punitive measures. Continuous dialogue prioritizes communication, trust, and conflict resolution, leading to a more inclusive workplace.
At year-end, bonuses are distributed equally based on overall profits, with raises reflecting market value rather than subjective evaluations. While this system isn't flawless, it is significantly better than relying on arbitrary criteria influenced by biases.
We save the competitive spirit for our annual retreat games, where I embrace the challenge. In the workplace, however, collaboration should reign supreme, ultimately benefiting everyone.
Thank you for reading! If you found this article insightful, consider subscribing to my new Substack, "Mom, Interrupted," where I delve into the complexities of motherhood, work, and identity.