Before my journey into mathematics began, rain held a special significance in my life. After a downpour, I would eagerly place the paper boat my father crafted for me into the puddles that formed on our street. During my university days, biking in the rain became a cherished hobby, and I found joy in watching birds sip rainwater from a bucket my grandmother had set out. Being drenched by the rain was never a concern for me. Yet, I did take care to shield my books from getting wet by tucking them under my jacket.

For many years, rain was simply a source of joy. However, in my first university year, a question from my math professor transformed my perception of rain into a mathematical conundrum: _Who gets wetter, the person walking in the rain or the one running?_

Initially, I didn't approach this inquiry with much mathematical rigor. I questioned why it mattered if someone, already soaked, chose to walk or run. Everyone seemed to be sprinting towards shelter, indicating that the running individual must be getting less wet. I arrived at this conclusion, unaware that most people frequently make errors in judgment. _Consider the political choices made in Turkey, Brazil, the USA, Russia, India, North Korea, and other nations; they illustrate just how often people can be mistaken._

I decided to investigate the rain dilemma myself. However, my indecision between running or walking ultimately left me drenched.

After putting everything aside and analyzing the situation scientifically, I realized that arriving at a definitive answer was nearly impossible due to the myriad variables involved. For instance, the destination significantly impacts how long someone remains exposed to the rain, making it a crucial factor in this question.

“Mathematics is not merely about finding the right answer; it is about understanding why that answer is correct.” — Ali Nesin.

Imagine you and a friend are at a café, enjoying mango tea, debating whether the runner or the walker in the rain gets wetter. Neither of you can sway the other’s opinion. As you prepare to visit a fantastic bookstore 100 meters away, rain begins to fall. A game of rock-paper-scissors determines that you will walk while your friend runs. In this scenario, you will end up wetter. However, this doesn't imply that the walker is always the wetter one; the time each spends in the rain differs, as your friend’s quick dash means they only experience a fraction of the rain you do.

To reach a more precise conclusion, one must adjust the travel distance against speed. If you walk at 2 meters per second and your friend sprints at 10 meters per second, while you both head to the bookstore, your friend, who must travel 500 meters, will likely get wetter than you, despite running.

*The reason I used the bookstore example is that many perceive such places as sanctuaries from the rain.*

Before delving into a logical explanation, let’s consider some experiments conducted by scientists on this topic. The MythBusters once demonstrated that both individuals, given equal time in the rain, found that the runner gets nearly double the wetness of the walker. Yet, they later conducted a different experiment yielding the opposite outcome.

But why the discrepancy? Variations in conditions, such as differing raindrop sizes and running speeds, played a significant role.

In 2012, scientists Trevor Wallis and Thomas Peterson sought clarity on this question by donning cotton clothing. They traveled the same distance, with Peterson running and Wallis walking. Upon weighing the clothing afterward, they discovered that Peterson’s outfit absorbed 40% more water.

However, these findings hold little practical significance. Calculations often overlook various variables, such as the assumption that raindrops fall straight down and are uniform in size. In physics and mathematics, such simplifications are common to facilitate conclusions. By making these assumptions, one can formulate equations to arrive at solutions, adopting a theoretical perspective.

For instance, Italian physician Franco Bocci utilized cuboids and cylinders to replace the human form in his experiments. His findings revealed that even the shape of raindrops could influence results, indicating that one must find the optimal speed to minimize rain exposure during windy conditions. You can explore Bocci’s research for more insights.

While this rain conundrum may seem trivial, it serves as an excellent exercise for sharpening mathematical reasoning skills. To tackle this question effectively, one must engage in thorough brainstorming about the variables at play.

For example, if a child considers that the runner might splash through more puddles than the walker, they demonstrate exceptional critical thinking skills.

Moreover, the intricate mathematical calculations might not be relevant here. If one notes that the walker is more exposed to rain falling from above while the runner encounters raindrops from ahead, they have identified a crucial aspect of the problem. Similarly, recognizing that rain angles shift with wind can also signal a thoughtful approach to finding a solution. _Without understanding all variable values, one cannot arrive at a definitive answer._

If a keen observer can determine the angle of falling rain and adjust their route accordingly, they might be on the cusp of genius.

In conclusion, mathematics represents a way of thinking. Contrary to the misconceptions promoted by inadequate educational systems, it is not merely about formulas and equations. It is not the domain of those indifferent to their appearance.

Mathematics is deeply woven into our daily lives. By paying attention to the world around you, you can uncover countless mathematical examples. For instance, a right angle is defined as precisely 90° in both geometry and trigonometry, corresponding to one-quarter of a full turn. The term originates from Latin, where "rectus" means "upright," referring to a vertical line perpendicular to a horizontal baseline. No one intentionally complicates mathematical concepts to confuse people. The term "probability" was chosen because it quantifies the likelihood of real-world occurrences. Anyone paying attention can see that the combined probability of an event occurring or not is one.

When raindrops lightly touch a car at a red light, they seem sparse, but once the light turns green and the car accelerates, it feels as though the rain intensifies. This observation illustrates that even a simple car ride can become a mathematical exercise, allowing one to solve complex questions logically.

The renowned mathematician Hilbert once told a student who abandoned mathematics for poetry, _“You made the right choice because you lack the necessary imagination to become a mathematician.”_ Those who fail to appreciate beauty may dismiss mathematics as cold and rigid, revealing their own lack of aesthetic appreciation and imagination.

Note 1: Beyond Euclid! is my weekly newsletter that curates high-quality math and science content to enrich your week. Consider subscribing to Beyond Euclid and supporting my work; it would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

Note 2: I earn commissions for purchases made via links in this post.