# Engineer Evaluation System Development Insights and Strategies
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Engineer Evaluation System
In my journey as an engineer, I began my career as a programmer, gradually evolving into a role that involved managing upstream processes like specification development. Throughout this progression, I have observed the challenges faced by individuals who were promoted solely based on their age without proper managerial guidance. This often leads to job mismatches that negatively affect not just the individual but also their colleagues and the overall organization.
Maximizing output hinges on placing skilled programmers in appropriate roles. Thus, it becomes clear that allowing engineers to focus on their areas of expertise is both efficient and beneficial for organizational success. Supporting diverse career paths can significantly contribute to a company's growth. Yet, this raises concerns regarding how to effectively integrate these factors into the evaluation system.
Section 1.1: Evaluating Technical Proficiency
A key discussion point is how to assess high-level skills among engineers. There exists a natural hierarchy between engineers with advanced technical abilities and those with more basic skills. However, the specific skills, rarity, and salary expectations vary greatly depending on the programming language and specialty. Establishing minimum and maximum salary ranges based on the current job market and relevant programming languages is essential.
Section 1.2: Assessing Interpersonal Influence
While evaluating specialists on a field-by-field basis is necessary, it’s also important to consider their impact on their surroundings. If two engineers possess similar skill sets, the one who actively engages with colleagues and demonstrates enthusiasm for mentoring should receive a higher evaluation. This highlights the need to incorporate contributions beyond mere technical skills into the assessment process.
Subsection 1.2.1: Evaluating Generalist Skills
Conversely, some engineers may not excel in a specific area but can manage a wide array of tasks, from infrastructure setup to front-end implementation across various platforms. It is crucial to ensure that those who can efficiently launch services with limited resources are recognized in the evaluation process.
Chapter 2: Business Impact Considerations
A pertinent question arises: should business performance be factored into evaluations? While the assessment framework emphasizes technical skills and teamwork, it also recognizes engineers who significantly contribute to service development, especially in small startups. However, evaluating solely based on sales can disadvantage those venturing into uncharted markets.
It’s vital to note that engineers often do not have the autonomy to select the services they oversee. If evaluations are tied strictly to sales performance, it may lead to engineers seeking transfers to more lucrative projects, undermining the broader goals of the organization.
Section 2.1: Aiming for an Independent Evaluation System
Our goal is to create an evaluation system that transcends company directives. Often, the choice of programming languages and tools is dictated by the services offered, limiting engineers' exposure to various skills. While evaluating skill levels is important, it's equally necessary to provide ample opportunities for engineers to learn and grow.
We aim to foster an environment where engineers can experiment with new ideas, share knowledge, and elevate the overall skill level of the organization. As Abraham Lincoln once articulated, the evaluation system should be designed by engineers for engineers, promoting continuous learning and improvement.
Section 2.2: The Framework of the Evaluation System
After thorough deliberation over six months, we established three career paths: specialist, generalist, and management. This evaluation framework assigns points based on the necessary skills and competencies for each role, while also allowing flexibility for career transitions.
Initially, I viewed the evaluation system as a way to express the type of engineer the company aspires to cultivate. It reflects the organization's perspective on its engineers and serves as a guide for individual career aspirations.
In conclusion, the process of developing an engineer evaluation system has provided invaluable insights into my future career ambitions and aspirations for the next five to ten years.
For more information, visit PlainEnglish.io and subscribe to our free weekly newsletter. Follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Discord for updates.