A Critical Reflection on the Climate Crisis and Its Implications
Written on
What I've Observed Recently
This week, I found myself reflecting deeply on an article I came across.
Doomers: A Critical Perspective
Michael Campi discusses his decision to avoid discussing the Climate Crisis with his daughter. He states,
"My daughter is turning 34 this year and is enjoying her life. Whenever I consider bringing up the Climate Crisis, I hesitate..."
He continues, "I'm confident she is aware of the situation and has chosen to focus on her happiness; I respect that."
Who Am I?
What authority do I hold to dampen her spirits? What gives me the right to inflict emotional distress? What justification do I have to fulfill my own needs at the expense of her joy? I do not see it as my duty to be the "Great Destroyer of Illusions," as some doom advocates claim. I hope I've matured beyond that.
Although Michael acknowledges me positively and suggests I'm not among the "Doomers," his insights resonated with me.
What Right Do I Have to Upset You?
I often focus solely on the Climate Crisis and my interpretations of it. Given that my views are considered "fringe," I strive to persuade you that your perceived reality is but an "illusion."
I aim to CONVINCE and CONVERT you.
As a writer, I recognize that this can lead to repetitive content. How many ways can I express that "Collapse is Happening" before it becomes tiresome? I advocate for a New Climate Paradigm, which compels me to continuously address the same issues to persuade and gain supporters.
I rationalize my writing by asserting that "the truth shall set you free" from the illusion of a utopian future propagated by Techno Optimists and Climate Moderates.
I seek to cultivate a knowledgeable and aware group of "influencers" ready for when the "Other 90%" of society finally "wakes up." I believe we are nearing "The Great Climate Awakening" as awareness of the Climate Crisis's overwhelming scope increases.
People's minds will become receptive to a "new paradigm." A window will open to shape the "Consensus Understanding" of the Climate Crisis, amidst a sea of conflicting ideas, misinformation, and disinformation.
You, dear readers, are my "missionaries." My "seeds" that I hope will disseminate my understanding of the Climate System and Crisis globally.
To save anything, we must collaborate. Unity is impossible unless we all recognize and agree on the same reality.
As you might gather, I possess a LARGE EGO and consider myself somewhat of a "monster." I have convinced myself of my correctness. I now believe I am "helping" you by "opening your eyes" to the world's reality.
If You Continue Engaging with My Work, It's Because You Seek Knowledge.
— — — — — —
THE HOUSING CRISIS
Are You Certain Your Home Holds That Value?
Climate risks remain unaccounted for in the valuation of American homes.
"For generations, home ownership has been viewed as a sound investment for the future. However, as wildfires and floods transform assets into liabilities, the stakes of homeownership escalate. Many economists now believe that, due to the disconnect between home prices and climate realities, a new housing bubble is forming. The extent of its growth will dictate the chaos that ensues when it inevitably bursts."
"Across the United States, homeowner's insurance costs are rising." "In regions like storm-prone Florida and coastal Louisiana, rates have surged; similar trends are evident in scorched areas of Colorado and California. Even states like Ohio and Wisconsin have seen hikes exceeding 15% within a year."
The significance of these increases is noteworthy: insurers, as risk assessors, serve as reliable indicators of reality. Due to climate change, American homes are statistically less secure than they once were.
"Even in states considered climate havens, such as Minnesota, residents are witnessing premium hikes due to increased hailstorms and thunderstorms."
A 2023 study revealed that U.S. residential properties are overvalued by $121 billion to $237 billion when accounting for current flood risks alone.
Soaring Insurance Costs Could Threaten Affordable Housing
Insurance premiums are escalating for homeowners across the board. In states like Florida, Texas, and California, obtaining insurance has become increasingly difficult. The industry cites larger, more frequent storms alongside rising home prices and construction costs as reasons for increased premiums or the cessation of policy offerings.
Affluent homeowners might forgo insurance if they can purchase properties outright. Landlords of market-rate apartments can raise rents to offset rising costs. However, for the approximately 4,000 nonprofits and developers restricted from raising rents or selling to buyers with limited budgets, the soaring cost of insurance poses an existential threat.
Real-Estate Investments for the Apocalypse
What if the worst-case scenarios unfold? What if a nuclear event occurs, or climate change transforms the world into chaos, or the next pandemic spreads through social media?
Billionaires are investing millions in custom bunkers, hoping to weather the apocalypse in comfort. Recently, a video surfaced of rapper Rick Ross boasting that his bunker surpasses Elon Musk's (notably, Musk is rumored not to own a bunker).
Ross’s bunker is designed with multiple “wings,” a “water maker,” and ample canned goods. It may even have its own bunker. But what about the rest of us? Are there budget-friendly underground shelters available for us to retreat to?
— — — — — —
CLIMATE CRISIS
Is Climate Change Accelerating Following an Unprecedented Year of Heat?
A rare disagreement has surfaced among climate scientists regarding the record-breaking heat of 2023. Some argue that the world has entered a new phase of warming.
As each month breaks temperature records, concerns mount that we may have crossed into a new warming era.
Is climate change truly accelerating?
As with many climate-related topics, the answer is complex. What remains clear is that the extreme heat of 2023 has unsettled climate scientists, leading to a rare division within the field.
"2023 was exceptionally warm, and we still lack a satisfactory explanation," states Zeke Hausfather from Berkeley Earth. "That alone is concerning."
Gavin Schmidt from NASA adds, "I would describe myself as ‘disquieted.’ We prefer to have answers and explanations for important issues like climate, and we had been relatively successful at providing those until last year."
The fundamental facts are not disputed: Earth's climate is warming primarily due to greenhouse gas emissions, and it will continue until we achieve net zero. However, because climate operates on a timescale of decades rather than years, interpreting the events of 2023 has created a rift among climate science experts.
The article outlines the moderate stance on the rate of warming.
"To clarify, mainstream climate scientists agree that we should anticipate an acceleration. The latest assessment from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicates that the warming rate until 2050 will be approximately 26% faster than from 1970 to the present."
In practical terms, moderates believe the rate of warming has increased to around +0.24°C per decade, while alarmists estimate it at +0.36°C per decade.
Moderates concede that the rate of warming has accelerated. The situation is worsening at an increasing pace, though they argue it isn't as dire as alarmists suggest.
"The notable rise in global temperatures last year cannot yet serve as definitive proof of an even sharper acceleration in climate change," states Colin Jones from the UK’s Met Office. "One year does not define a climate."
— — — — — —
CHINA
China's Urbanization Efforts May Hinder Birth Rate Goals
Demographers emphasize the urgency of addressing the effects of fast-paced, costly urban living on birth rates.
At a recent political assembly, China announced initiatives to create a "birth-friendly society," vowing to implement long-awaited measures from population experts, such as reducing childcare and education expenses.
However, to the dismay of these experts, Beijing also committed to increasing urban migration.
This policy aims to stimulate housing demand to support the struggling property market and to boost economic growth through enhanced productivity and consumption. Urban residents typically produce and purchase higher-value goods and services compared to their rural counterparts.
Yet, this new urbanization strategy disregards basic demographic principles. In urban areas, residents tend to have fewer children due to high housing costs, limited living space, expensive education, and the demands of work.
"The pattern is becoming increasingly evident. Global populations will not simply “continue to rise.” As nations industrialize and populations transition from predominantly rural to urban, family sizes decrease."
Even absent the Climate Crisis, global populations were already "peaking" due to the rapid trend toward urbanization. Over 52% of the world's population now resides in urban centers.
— — — — — —
SEA LEVEL RISE
Our Bizarre Quest for "Sea Level"
Brooke Jarvis explores the historical context behind the quest for determining sea level, as detailed in a new book by Wilko Graf von.
Oddly, mountains have influenced our perception of sea level as a stable reference point against which we can gauge the height of lofty peaks.
We confidently state that Mt. Rainier reaches 14,411 feet above sea level without pausing to consider: which sea, when, and under what conditions?
The oceans are perpetually dynamic, influenced by the moon's gravitational pull (in the Bay of Fundy, a single tide can lower water levels by over fifty-three feet), wind, atmospheric pressure, and the substantial gravitational forces from glaciers and landmasses. Even temperature fluctuations in the ocean can alter water levels by affecting the proximity of water molecules.
More significantly, ocean levels have risen and fallen by hundreds of feet during ancient climatic shifts, enabling human migration across land bridges to the Americas, Australia, and the British Isles. Currently, oceans are encroaching upon coastlines and cities at an alarming rate.
It seems absurd to treat mean sea level—something described as "ephemeral as a fleeting ray of sunshine on a winter afternoon" by Australian geologist Rhodes W. Fairbridge in 1961—as a stable benchmark.
How did we come to equate the sea with stability?
— — — — — —
SOCIETY
Politicians Intensify Attacks on Scientific Education in U.S. Schools
An increasing number of states are enacting laws that challenge scientific theories.
Nearly a century ago, science teacher John Scopes faced conviction for violating a Tennessee law that prohibited teaching evolution. Although his conviction was overturned on a technicality in 1927, laws banning the teaching of Darwin's theory persisted for another 40 years, only to be ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1968.
In recent decades, conservative or religious groups opposing the inclusion of evolution in science curricula have adopted a different strategy. They now argue that if evolution is taught, alternative views, such as "intelligent design"—a proxy for creationism—should also be included.
This approach is not restricted to evolution alone. Legislatures nationwide are proposing or passing laws that ostensibly promote scientific dialogue but effectively encourage students to view established scientific theories as equivalent to unfounded ideas.
For instance, in the Kitzmiller v. Dover case over two decades ago, a federal court determined that intelligent design lacks empirical support and testable hypotheses, thereby violating the First Amendment's prohibition against state endorsement of religion.
"Theories AREN'T FACT" has become the rallying cry of these educational reformers. Consequently, they argue that religious beliefs should be presented as "competing theories."
LORD HAVE MERCY.
— — — — — —
The Current State of End Times: A Boring Perspective
Optimism is now in vogue.
The Incredible Disappearing Doomsday, by Kyle Paoletta
How the climate alarmists learned to stop worrying and embrace calm.
A significant shift occurred last October with the New York Times Magazine's annual climate issue, which showcased comic-style depictions of "The New World" that climate change could create, illustrated by Anuj Shrestha and annotated by David Wallace-Wells.
"Not too long ago," Wallace-Wells noted, some scientists feared that emissions could lead to four or five degrees Celsius of warming, inducing existential dread about apocalyptic futures.
Now a two-to-three-degree increase seems more plausible, thanks to a global political awakening, a remarkable drop in clean energy prices, heightened policy ambitions, and revisions of fundamental modeling assumptions.
The outlook has become uncertain.
In a separate essay titled "Beyond Catastrophe," Wallace-Wells elaborated, "We have halved the expected warming in just five years." The discourse is shifting from alarmism and denialism to sober assessments of the changes required by a world whose transformation, while profound, would fall "mercifully short of a true climate apocalypse."
According to a 2023 YouGov poll of a thousand respondents, in 2022, the Pew Research Center found that 39% of U.S. adults believe we are living in end times.
66% fear nuclear annihilation, 65% worry about the potential for global war, 53% believe the next pandemic could be lethal, 52% are concerned about climate change (though only 23% think it will negatively impact them in their lifetime), 46% fear artificial intelligence, 42% worry about divine intervention, 37% are apprehensive about asteroid impacts, 31% are concerned about global infertility, 25% dread alien invasions, 8% predict the end will arrive within the next decade.
"Despite the stark contrast with the optimistic vision in "Beyond Catastrophe," Wallace-Wells is not the only journalist whose framing of the climate crisis has evolved in recent years."
"Previously, climate experts provided weary summaries of daunting research; now they offer assurances of progress and a potentially bright future."
Given the rapid shift in tone, the average news consumer might conclude that a fundamental change has occurred. Perhaps, due to new solar fields and international agreements, a carbon-neutral future is imminent.
Unfortunately, that is not the reality.
"Global emissions have stabilized at levels that have already produced a +1.5°C increase in temperatures, meaning billions will suffer."
"This is not good news by any stretch."
"Ironically, it is the previous work of climate alarmists that renders the current reality appear novel and agreeable. The facts remain unchanged; only the narrative has shifted."
The "good news" is the belief that conditions won't deteriorate as severely as initially feared.
MAYBE.
I suspect that in five years we will have clarity on who is right.
But that is merely my perspective.
— rc 090124